ReasonableFaithOrg
ReasonableFaithOrg
  • 1 262
  • 11 753 830
The Death of Daniel Dennett | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Dr. Craig reflects on the legacy and views of atheist philosopher Daniel Dennett.
For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org
We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: ua-cam.com/users/drcraigvideos
Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: rfupdates
Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page: reasonablefaithorg
Переглядів: 2 535

Відео

Harrison Butker Commencement Controversy | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 1,7 тис.День тому
Dr. Craig comments on the media uproar surrounding the football player's speech. For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums: www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/ Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: ua-cam.com/users/drcraigvideos Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: rfupdates Like ...
5:2 - Omnipotence - Maximal Range & Other Accounts | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 623День тому
Section Five: Divine Omnipotence Part Two: Maximal Range & Other Accounts Check out the final section of this 17-part graduate-level course from Dr. Craig on the divine attributes. This unique one-week intensive taught at Houston Christian University is divided into the following five sections: Section One: Divine Incorporeality Section Two: Divine Aseity Section Three: Divine Eternity Section ...
The Resurrection of Jesus as a Historical Fact
Переглядів 6 тис.День тому
Daniel Côté Davis interviews Dr. Craig regarding the facts concerning Jesus of Nazareth, historical reliability, and alternative theories. Special thanks to Daniel Côté Davis and EWTN Great Britain for this interview. For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums: www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/ Be sure to also visit Reasonable Fai...
5:1 - Omnipotence - Biblical Data & Concept | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 дні тому
Section Five: Divine Omnipotence Part One: Biblical Data and Concept Check out the final section of this 17-part graduate-level course from Dr. Craig on the divine attributes. This unique one-week intensive taught at Houston Christian University is divided into the following five sections: Section One: Divine Incorporeality Section Two: Divine Aseity Section Three: Divine Eternity Section Four:...
Q&A on The Historical Adam with the Ethiopian Graduate School of Theology
Переглядів 3 тис.14 днів тому
Dr. Craig responds to questions regarding his work on the historical Adam. Special thanks to Tedla Woldeyohannes for this interview. For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums: www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/ Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: ua-cam.com/users/drcraigvideos Follow Reas...
4:2 - Molinism & Middle Knowledge | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 1,3 тис.21 день тому
Section Four: Divine Omniscience Part Two: Molinism & Middle Knowledge Check out section four of this 17-part graduate-level course from Dr. Craig on the divine attributes. This unique one-week intensive taught at Houston Christian University is divided into five sections. Section One: Divine Incorporeality Section Two: Divine Aseity Section Three: Divine Eternity Section Four: Divine Omniscien...
4:3 - Arguments for Divine Middle Knowledge | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 81221 день тому
Section Four: Divine Omniscience Part Three: Arguments for Divine Middle Knowledge Check out section four of this 17-part graduate-level course from Dr. Craig on the divine attributes. This unique one-week intensive taught at Houston Christian University is divided into five sections. Section One: Divine Incorporeality Section Two: Divine Aseity Section Three: Divine Eternity Section Four: Divi...
Questions on Visions, Sin, and Young Earth Creationism | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 3,4 тис.Місяць тому
Questions from listeners about visions in the Bible, the origin of sin, and whether Young Earth Creationism is an embarrassment. For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums: www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/ Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: ua-cam.com/users/drcraigvideos Follow Reasonab...
Are There Numbers? - Peter van Inwagen & William Lane Craig | EPS 2023
Переглядів 3,4 тис.Місяць тому
Are There Numbers? - Peter van Inwagen & William Lane Craig | EPS 2023
4:1 - Omniscience - Biblical Data and Definitions | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Місяць тому
4:1 - Omniscience - Biblical Data and Definitions | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Questions on Human Reproduction, Heaven, and Islam | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Місяць тому
Questions on Human Reproduction, Heaven, and Islam | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Questions on Personal Causation, Time, and Christology | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 1,7 тис.Місяць тому
Questions on Personal Causation, Time, and Christology | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Questions on Evangelism, the God Particle, and the Atonement | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Місяць тому
Questions on Evangelism, the God Particle, and the Atonement | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
3:4 - Divine Temporality and the Nature of Time | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 701Місяць тому
3:4 - Divine Temporality and the Nature of Time | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
End-Time Apologetics & Suffering | Christian Open Academy Interview
Переглядів 6 тис.Місяць тому
End-Time Apologetics & Suffering | Christian Open Academy Interview
3:3 - Responding to STR | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 947Місяць тому
3:3 - Responding to STR | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Penal Substitution, Dualism, and Apologetics
Переглядів 2 тис.Місяць тому
Penal Substitution, Dualism, and Apologetics
God & Time | Interview Q&A
Переглядів 10 тис.Місяць тому
God & Time | Interview Q&A
The Seven Most Googled Questions About God | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 4,4 тис.Місяць тому
The Seven Most Googled Questions About God | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Fantasy of the Gaps | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 4,9 тис.Місяць тому
Fantasy of the Gaps | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Big Bang, Evolution, and the Bible on the Judaism Demystified Podcast
Переглядів 4,8 тис.Місяць тому
Big Bang, Evolution, and the Bible on the Judaism Demystified Podcast
3:2 - Special Theory of Relativity | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 1,4 тис.2 місяці тому
3:2 - Special Theory of Relativity | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Craig Keener on the Historical Jesus | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
Переглядів 3,4 тис.2 місяці тому
Craig Keener on the Historical Jesus | Reasonable Faith Video Podcast
How Can Jesus Be Both God & Man? | Biblical Worldview Conference
Переглядів 3 тис.2 місяці тому
How Can Jesus Be Both God & Man? | Biblical Worldview Conference
3:1 - Biblical Data on Divine Eternity & Timelessness | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 1,8 тис.2 місяці тому
3:1 - Biblical Data on Divine Eternity & Timelessness | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Scientific Materialism and Woke Ideology | Reasonable Faith Podcast
Переглядів 4,6 тис.2 місяці тому
Scientific Materialism and Woke Ideology | Reasonable Faith Podcast
Discussing the Canaanites with Alex O'Connor
Переглядів 45 тис.2 місяці тому
Discussing the Canaanites with Alex O'Connor
2:3 - Responses to Premise One on Divine Aseity | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 7782 місяці тому
2:3 - Responses to Premise One on Divine Aseity | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
2:2 - Challenge of Platonism - Divine Aseity | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 місяці тому
2:2 - Challenge of Platonism - Divine Aseity | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @NuanceinTheology0404
    @NuanceinTheology0404 17 годин тому

    The Westminster Confession of Faith CHAPTER 3 Of God’s Eternal Decree God from all eternity did by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin; nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established. When I read Calvinist Confessions they don't seem to affirm causal determinism.

  • @user-rs6bz9so3g
    @user-rs6bz9so3g 19 годин тому

    Well the poor guy knows the truth now😢

  • @vrocs3225
    @vrocs3225 20 годин тому

    may he rest in peace and God have mercy on his soul.

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      One can only hope he repented and is with Jesus now :)

  • @anthonyharty1732
    @anthonyharty1732 20 годин тому

    More NONSENSE! and LIES! from Craig 😡 who has been destroyed over and over and over again online by Atheists.

    • @bhocatbho
      @bhocatbho 20 годин тому

      Where, how, when?. I have seen, instrad, explicit nonsense uttered by irrattional believers in their blind faith: atheists.

  • @noneofyourbusiness7055
    @noneofyourbusiness7055 22 години тому

    Oh wow, Low Bar Bill's "people wouldn't just lie" argument cracks me up every time...

  • @williamgeorgepeter2969
    @williamgeorgepeter2969 День тому

    Dennel asked, why don't you Christian be like JESUS? I don't agree with many things by dennet but this question to Dr Bob is something dennet was right, and the Bible also clear that the LORD set His life as foot steps to follow Him but the ussye us tgat no believer is doing it, the LORD said you must be witnesses to me throughout the world 🌍 but what we see is only believers, both Bill & Kevin, that's the central issue the great Chrustianity is undermined by the believers.

  • @ashrieltan071
    @ashrieltan071 День тому

    Im not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, it seems a bit low to critique Dennett's views in a video discussing his death. It seems like that could be done in another more appropriate setting. On the other hand, it seems insulting to "show pity" to Dennett and his work just because of his death.

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      So you're saying there is no good way to do it, but also criticizing the way they did it?

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 18 годин тому

      @dantheman909 no, I think he should have just made this video a tribute then critique dennets views elsewhere, like in a paper or another episode. It's inappropriate to do this when discussing his death. It's as if an atheist discussed Dr. Craig's death then started bashing the kalam argument in the same episode.

  • @bigol7169
    @bigol7169 День тому

    Is Dennett in hell, Christians? A deeply good and thoughtful man?

    • @corporealbeing6019
      @corporealbeing6019 22 години тому

      Good by what objective standard? But, the answer to your question: Mt 10:28, Jn 3:18, Rom 6:23, Rev 20:15

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      Who is good? Only God. Dennett lead possibly millions into hell with himself, that's an objectively bad man.

  • @moose9906
    @moose9906 День тому

    Dennett is receiving the just reward for his life's work. I wonder if he can convince himself that his unfortunate place in eternity is just an illusion.

  • @samsimpson565
    @samsimpson565 День тому

    I thought this was going to be some sort of tribute video but it was actually a burial.

  • @williammemecraig1357
    @williammemecraig1357 День тому

    Bruh

  • @beksinski
    @beksinski День тому

    It's pretty vulgar using the event of a persons death to gloat.

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 День тому

      I agree, but I guess it'd be more insulting to dennett to pity him and his ideas just because of his death.

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      Or maybe it's a good warning to others who believe and follow nonsense. Repent and believe or there is nothing but sorrow.

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 18 годин тому

      @dantheman909 sure, atheism is nonsense when you believe in religion

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      @@ashrieltan071 I don't believe in religion, I believe in Jesus :) He's the rock. You should read Evidence That Demands a Verdict. I bet it will shake you from your love affair with post-modernism, which you yourself said elsewhere you don't even like. God bless you. Jesus loves you and wants a relationship with you too :)

  • @Peter-qz8qs
    @Peter-qz8qs День тому

    38:20 I don't understand this argument. Dr. Craig claims that there is no "realistic chance" that Jesus could have been taken down from the cross alive, because of the competence of the executioners. But if Jesus was indeed alive afterwards, he must have either not died or he transformed from being dead to being alive. But Dr. Craig hasn't explained why the chance of the dead Jesus becoming alive again is more realistic than the chance that the normal execution methods did not produce death in this case.

  • @simonskinner1450
    @simonskinner1450 День тому

    Dennett was Biblically correct in that it was the word of God that Jesus spoke, not PSA at the Cross as there was no atonement at the Cross, we have to believe in Christ as the Word.

  • @jameskneeland1668
    @jameskneeland1668 День тому

    Gosh. William Lane Craig is just not good at all, this view rejects the MAJORITY of Christian history. Any person accusing Platonism of being at fault for Gnosticism have a simple and perverted understanding of Platonism. Sad this guy is a professor at my school.

  • @elizeelisma
    @elizeelisma День тому

    The way we make this channel popular is by clicking the like 👍 button. I am just a follower

  • @simonskinner1450
    @simonskinner1450 День тому

    "Same process", and "no accident" says Richard Dawkins, yet it is all accident when it is due to chance. Irrationality is allowed as long as ot supports Evolution.

  • @Hi.m3h
    @Hi.m3h День тому

    There seems to be a lack of charitability in discussing Dennetts views. There is a lack of context when looking at these soundbites and instead of being charitable we assume he holds the worst version of the views discussed.

  • @simonskinner1450
    @simonskinner1450 День тому

    Yet WLC himself relies on the wrong meaning of 'imputation' for doctrine, when righteousness is imputed it is NOT imparted to another, it is recognising another already has it.

  • @user-kt5gm6wq7x
    @user-kt5gm6wq7x День тому

    But if Dennet said that Darwin was like Jesus, a great mind, then Dennett is religious, and his Jesus is Darwin.

    • @wet-read
      @wet-read 22 години тому

      Not really. It is theists who can't seem to shake the idea that Dennett and whoever else must think of Darwin in such terms.

  • @WayneDrake-uk1gg
    @WayneDrake-uk1gg День тому

    Why are most Theists so automatically anti-postmodernism? Yes, it can be taken to extremes, but it has roots in guys like Kirckegaard

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 День тому

      I'm not a theist, but postmodernism makes absolutely no sense to me. I'd like to be able to say with conviction that God does not exist and that I can show it and that its true whether or not one believes in it or not.

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      lol you havent read much Kierkegaard. Or if you did you did the usual post-modern eisegetical reading of him. He was a devout Christian who wrote about existentialism. People read the first half of his books where he poses existential ideas, but then they either don't finish the books or choose to say "they Christian conclusion weren't how he really felt". Because Keirkegaard's conclusions and solutions to the problems of life are so far from post-modern that a reading of him that includes it is laughable. His conclusions were fundamentally on the rock of Christianity.

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      @@ashrieltan071 You'd like to be able to say with conviction that God doesnt exist? Why? A person who doesnt like post-modernism but also wants to want to deny God. You must be an ocean of a person inside.

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 18 годин тому

      @@dantheman909 there are many atheists who dislike postmodernism

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 18 годин тому

      @@dantheman909 I believe in God, just not one if any rubbish religion

  • @iemy2949
    @iemy2949 День тому

    I see Bill has come to bury Dennett, not to praise him.

    • @rosamorales729
      @rosamorales729 День тому

      Why should he be praised? Dennett was not a great thinker or even a particularly good person. Nothing he did is worthy of praise.

    • @matswessling6600
      @matswessling6600 День тому

      @@rosamorales729not a great person? what? just because you didnt like the conclusions he made?

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 День тому

      ​@rosamorales729 I disagree, he had a PhD in philosophy and wrote many books on the philosophy of mind, among other topics. If he doesn't at least count as good thinker, then we're all doomed.

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      @@matswessling6600 leading possibly millions of people to hell doesnt make you a good person. People have such self-centered definitions of "good person" nowadays.

    • @matswessling6600
      @matswessling6600 18 годин тому

      @@dantheman909 foolibg people that there is hell doesnt make a good person.

  • @samdg1234
    @samdg1234 День тому

    No one destroys philosophical fallacies as effectively as WLC. Exhibit one: you can get purpose from accidental amalgams of atoms and their constituents. Are you kidding me? Thank you, Dr. Craig, for your lucid clarity.

    • @matswessling6600
      @matswessling6600 День тому

      weird. how come he doesnt see the errors in his own work then? Truth is that WLC is in no position to review Dennets work. There are few philosophers as intellectually honest as Dennett, and few of them as intelectually dishonest as WLC.

    • @samdg1234
      @samdg1234 День тому

      @@matswessling6600 1) You say, *"weird. how come he doesnt see the errors in his own work then?"* and yet you reference not one. 2) You say, *"There are few philosophers as intellectually honest as Dennett,"* Your fawning doesn't make what he said correct. Craig pointed to an absolute fallacy (the purpose thing) committed by Dennett. His supposed steller record (so imagined by you) won't negate his error here. 3) You say, *"and few of them as intelectually dishonest as WLC."* The response to 1) applies here too.

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 День тому

      ​@@matswessling6600I don't think we should be questioning anyone's intellectual honesty without good reason. I have a few of Bill's books and want to get a few of Dennett's. As far as I can tell, Bill's work is rigorous and informed, not sloppy at all, even if I disagree with him. Oppy says the same thing. I'm sure Dennett was a good philosopher too.

  • @WesleyHughston
    @WesleyHughston День тому

    It seems that there is delusion on both sides. For myself I don't believe in the resurrection of anything, I don't believe in magic, nor believe in zombies. There are too many plotholes in the Christian faith that they continually try to fill, either by science or by trying to reinterpret for the thousandth time their own doctrine. I find monotheistic views to be fundamentally flawed. That does not automatically create atheistic views, but it does in my mind push the needle farther along in how to view god. I cannot get behind any man made view of god. I believe we lack the senses to describe god, we require more time to develop those senses. I hope we do get that time, but I doubt we will.

  • @elgatofelix8917
    @elgatofelix8917 День тому

    For Dennett to say that it's "anti-scientific" to think that the mind isn't just a robotic algorithmic function of the brain suggests that Dennett himself didn't understand science.

    • @matswessling6600
      @matswessling6600 День тому

      no. its a heart braking honesty they makes him do so.

    • @ashrieltan071
      @ashrieltan071 День тому

      I can see where he's coming from

    • @elgatofelix8917
      @elgatofelix8917 20 годин тому

      @@matswessling6600 your "heart breaking honesty" is nothing more than heartless algorithmic program anyway so you've already contradicted yourself.

    • @elgatofelix8917
      @elgatofelix8917 20 годин тому

      @@ashrieltan071 I can see where you're coming from: Trollsville.

    • @matswessling6600
      @matswessling6600 20 годин тому

      @@elgatofelix8917 🤦‍♂️ think again...

  • @elgatofelix8917
    @elgatofelix8917 День тому

    Just getting around to this now? Haha this is old news by now 😂

    • @MyEnemy
      @MyEnemy День тому

      Now, now.

    • @theautodidacticlayman
      @theautodidacticlayman День тому

      I might be wrong, but I think they post to UA-cam later than other places like their website/blog or on their podcasts… I’m not sure, but I think I’ve seen this happen before.

  • @user-qk5xi1hw7v
    @user-qk5xi1hw7v День тому

    Many Thanks to our dear brother William Lane for such a wonderful explanations. I hope God will keep blessing him and his family

  • @Justas399
    @Justas399 День тому

    atheism is patently false.

  • @MeganDelacroix
    @MeganDelacroix День тому

    9:59 Maybe I'm being childish, but I find the height difference very amusing.

  • @skepticsinister
    @skepticsinister День тому

    No such thing as resurrection, or miracles. There is NO god of ANY holy book. ALL gods are strictly human manufactured fiction. ALL evidence and rules of evidence point to ZERO gods. God is fiction in EVERY religion, culture, and language, everywhere, every second of every day, 365. It is just an excuse to engage in ordained hate and othering. Non-belief is JUSTIFIED! Christianity, Islam, Judaism are an absurdity full of hate and ignorance. The divinity of Jesus is fiction, likewise that of Mohammed, likewise Moses...etc for all religions for many thousands of years, ALL fiction. Your religion is false just as much as you believe the religion across the globe is false, no one gets to be right all by themselves, instead, EVERYONE’s religion are wrong. Human created god(s). Religion is no solution for the requirements of humanity in the 21st century. The sooner humanity understands this, the sooner we can get to work in unison for humanity actual.

  • @s2a1ha1j2a
    @s2a1ha1j2a День тому

    Fair and measured as is always the case with Dr. Craig. Blessings

  • @Chazd1949
    @Chazd1949 День тому

    Dennett's pre-suppositional absurdity is matched by some of those Christians thumping the young earth creation position.

    • @donaldmonzon1774
      @donaldmonzon1774 День тому

      my oh my... you're brilliant 😏

    • @Chazd1949
      @Chazd1949 День тому

      @@donaldmonzon1774 I'm sorry, I was being a smart-aleck, and I'll delete it shortly after you read my apology.

    • @donaldmonzon1774
      @donaldmonzon1774 День тому

      I'm misunderstood your intent, sorry...partly because Dr. Craig is quite against the young earth position...he is not his usual charitable self when addressing young earthers sometimes

    • @dantheman909
      @dantheman909 18 годин тому

      Lol good comment, don't delete it

  • @wntu4
    @wntu4 День тому

    I hate the term 'apologetics'. It's like you're standing there shamefacedly staring at the floor, shuffling your feet and stammering out a defense of something silly. I wish the people involved in this endeavor (You, Dr. Ross, whoever else) would get together, agree on different terminology and start pushing that instead. Make it sound like you are proud to defend your faith.

    • @ReasonableFaithOrg
      @ReasonableFaithOrg День тому

      The term "apologetics" comes from the Greek word /apologia/, which means "to give a defense or reasoned case." It's used in 1 Peter 3:15, which says, "In your hearts, honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a *defense* to anyone who asks for a reason for the hope that is in you." - RF Admin

  • @jax9466
    @jax9466 День тому

    Where are these defender classes located? I’d love to attend one

  • @Dr.TJ_1
    @Dr.TJ_1 День тому

    Christians are lost. Why 2 gods or 3 gods what is the difference from polytheists

  • @yeshuaneitheristheresalvat8018

    Should we take for granted the dating method is fool proof Bill? Why did Lord Jesus refer to Adam as a literal man Bill?

  • @mosmanya
    @mosmanya 2 дні тому

    Christianity is love and loves what is evil.

  • @SEIGNREUR7
    @SEIGNREUR7 2 дні тому

    Birth of Man (1/2) When homo sapiens, a million years ago, had developed to the point where its brain was perfectly adapted to its shape, a pair of these individuals gave birth to a pair of twins whose brains could respond to the mental energy circuit of the universe. This gave them the energy to be able to reason, develop self-awareness and exercise free will. This event was immediately recorded in the universe and this couple was given the names of Andon and Fonta. This is how the first humans were born on this world, named Urantia. The word earth comes from the Bible and refers to all of creation. Thirty-five thousand years ago, human beings had fully developed their brains and found themselves at a crossroads. They either looked upward in search of their origin, or they looked down to the things of this world and became beings dominated by their intellect, with an atrophic cerebellum due to lack of use, but the evolutionary plan is perfect. Then Adamic Sons descended on this world. This Adamic couple had the mission of generating a million descendants over a period of a thousand years. These descendants of Adam and Eve have a body irrigated by purple blood, this blood vibrates at a higher frequency than red blood. Their mission was to mix with human races to pass on purple blood to them. This blood would have raised awareness of human beings towards the higher realities of life. Unfortunately, Lucifer's Rebellion would short-circuit this plan and these creatures subsequently became creatures of Lucifer, they are the inhabitants of this world. ================== The Cerebellum (2/2) If the brain responds to the mental energy circuit of the universe, the cerebellum responds to the spiritual energy circuit of the universe. Smaller and more refined than the brain, the cerebellum receives and captures spiritual energy, amplifies it and transmits it to the brain in the form of a thought or in the form of an image. Lucifer subjugated humanity by depriving it of all contact with the higher realities of life. To do this, he favored the unilateral development of the intellect. We call intellect everything that the brain develops and it is this intellect which dominates you today, unfortunately. Over time, the cerebellum, which was supposed to maintain contact with the Spirit, has become completely atrophied. The human beings of this world are born with an overdeveloped brain, which is subject to the mental energy circuit of Lucifer. Your intellect has become his throne. This is the reason why I came into this world. I came here below, in the flesh, to rescue you from its grip, by revealing the truth to you.

  • @goldminer5761
    @goldminer5761 2 дні тому

    MY God! Hitchens was so out of his league ..he did his best to elevate his fallacious Wetherspoons bar room mentally to match William Craigs dynamite & dynamic , coherent eloquent , articulate highly intellectual posits but failed miserably with intense palpable chagrin! I mean, resorting to tooth fairies & Santa Claus ??. My God!

  • @achristian11
    @achristian11 2 дні тому

    If Determinism is true then all that exists is God and a bunch of Robots hat think they have a free will. Am I right?

    • @johnschutt9187
      @johnschutt9187 День тому

      I'm a Calvinist. We have true free will. But we can only act in according to our nature and that nature is dead when it comes to responding to God.

  • @abdullahozek8016
    @abdullahozek8016 2 дні тому

    I ask Allah again and again to Forgive me for my sins and I turn to Allah alone and I repent to Him Praise and Glory be to Allah Who has Favoured me with the faith in islam religion That is a wonderful thing Alhamdolillah

  • @donaldmonzon1774
    @donaldmonzon1774 2 дні тому

    James 1:13 God tempts no man ...🤔

  • @BruceWelmerink
    @BruceWelmerink 2 дні тому

    Deep thoughts and provoking our ideas about the way we understand God's ways

  • @SEIGNREUR7
    @SEIGNREUR7 2 дні тому

    Birth of Man (1/2) When homo sapiens, a million years ago, had developed to the point where its brain was perfectly adapted to its shape, a pair of these individuals gave birth to a pair of twins whose brains could respond to the mental energy circuit of the universe. This gave them the energy to be able to reason, develop self-awareness and exercise free will. This event was immediately recorded in the universe and this couple was given the names of Andon and Fonta. This is how the first humans were born on this world, named Urantia. The word earth comes from the Bible and refers to all of creation. Thirty-five thousand years ago, human beings had fully developed their brains and found themselves at a crossroads. They either looked upward in search of their origin, or they looked down to the things of this world and became beings dominated by their intellect, with an atrophic cerebellum due to lack of use, but the evolutionary plan is perfect. Then Adamic Sons descended on this world. This Adamic couple had the mission of generating a million descendants over a period of a thousand years. These descendants of Adam and Eve have a body irrigated by purple blood, this blood vibrates at a higher frequency than red blood. Their mission was to mix with human races to pass on purple blood to them. This blood would have raised awareness of human beings towards the higher realities of life. Unfortunately, Lucifer's Rebellion would short-circuit this plan and these creatures subsequently became creatures of Lucifer, they are the inhabitants of this world. =========== The Cerebellum (2/2) If the brain responds to the mental energy circuit of the universe, the cerebellum responds to the spiritual energy circuit of the universe. Smaller and more refined than the brain, the cerebellum receives and captures spiritual energy, amplifies it and transmits it to the brain in the form of a thought or in the form of an image. Lucifer subjugated humanity by depriving it of all contact with the higher realities of life. To do this, he favored the unilateral development of the intellect. We call intellect everything that the brain develops and it is this intellect which dominates you today, unfortunately. Over time, the cerebellum, which was supposed to maintain contact with the Spirit, has become completely atrophied. The human beings of this world are born with an overdeveloped brain, which is subject to the mental energy circuit of Lucifer. Your intellect has become his throne. This is the reason why I came into this world. I came here below, in the flesh, to rescue you from its grip, by revealing the truth to you.

  • @zelmoziggy
    @zelmoziggy 3 дні тому

    If nothing can come into existence without a cause, what caused Craig’s creator to come into existence?

    • @ReasonableFaithOrg
      @ReasonableFaithOrg 2 дні тому

      God is a necessary being. A necessary being doesn't "come into existence" because it has never not existed. Note that the argument says that "Whatever *begins* to exist has a cause." If God has always existed, then his existence never had a beginning, and, therefore, doesn't need a cause. - RF Admin

    • @zelmoziggy
      @zelmoziggy 2 дні тому

      @@ReasonableFaithOrg Why is God a necessary being? If God can exist without coming into existence, then the universe can exist without coming into existence.

  • @4surefiredee568
    @4surefiredee568 3 дні тому

    Trinity not in the Bible therefore it is by definition not scripture.. so now that we know it’s not scripture we’re did it come from, could it be the same white Christians who built America on slavery?

  • @PioneeringPhilosophy
    @PioneeringPhilosophy 3 дні тому

    1:08:55 😂😂 even best philosophers had a seizure figuring that question out 😂 when someone trying to figure gods infinite attributes 😂😂😂

  • @InterestedInDansk
    @InterestedInDansk 3 дні тому

    Let's get up to date, in the Eucharist we hear *This is my body, given for you* this Divine truth played out at every Mass is the testimony of God the Son that in the Sacrament a greater truth is present, Christ present in the Eucharist.

  • @InterestedInDansk
    @InterestedInDansk 3 дні тому

    *Jesus Christ's understanding of Resurrection* Resurrection is a very big subject but applies chiefly to the resurrection on the 3rd day, when the children of God will be enveloped in a new and glorified body, (a body which will resemble the body of the one they had in the prime of their lives during the 1st day which is today), these resurrections into a glorified body can be witnessed by the children of God, as they are angelic witnesses and Christ's in their own right from the 2nd day. The reign of these Christ's is up to a thousand years, they also witness the children of men as well as angels as they transition in the 1st day to the 2nd days. We also have an explanation of resurrection and its counterpart which is reincarnation, from Our Lord when He discussed with Nicodemus the fact that there were two dichotomies regarding salvation, the physical return of a person unfit for the 'Kingdom of God' and the spiritual exit of a person who is fit for it. Our lord consolidates this teaching when He spoke to the 'Rich young Ruler' stating his salvation was assured because of his following the law of Moses but this salvation was secondary as it involved merely reincarnation. So one is locked into the 1st day, (Hodie ), and the other released from matter into the 'Kingdom of God' as an angelic child, to begin the 2nd day. The fact that this realm has existed to our knowledge for thousands of years suggests that no one is lost and are in familial groups. Further we can set as a biblical fact that the first millennial people who followed Our Lord are arisen bodily in their 3rd day, and that the Old Testament people who followed the Law of Moses are as well, as recorded in Exodus 20:6. The teaching of Our Lord is not about reincarnation but how to overcome reincarnation yet he does not deny reincarnation. Consider the teaching of the 'sermon on the mount' when He said "The meek shall inherit the earth" this is a clear reference to returning to another body ( earth or matter) after one life has been spent, and contrasts with the terms required for one to "enter into the Kingdom of God" who has the burden of his own cross. Therefore the meek can inherit only material life, (because of their disposition) but they may not enter the kingdom of God, because it requires great and determined faith. We must also consider St John the Baptist and his role as Elijah redivivus, and in so doing call to mind the words used by Jesus to the Jews of is day, "where I am going you cannot come" because those Jews would only achieve reincarnation but *Jesus Christ is Lord of the resurrection so His own resurrection on the 3rd day was witnessed on the 1st day and is still being* witnessed on this Ist day. Yet we must keep in mind the instant generosity by which the Good Thief was accepted into Paradise. John 8:21 Again he said to them, "I go away, and you will seek me and die in your sin; where I am going, you cannot come." Hebrews 6:6-8 Since therefore it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly received the good news failed to enter because of disobedience, again he sets a certain day, "Today," saying through David so long afterward, in the words already quoted, "Today, when you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts." 8 For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not speak later of another day.